<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Basic Steps to Plan Your Residential Solar Energy System</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.residentialsolarpanels.org/plan-solar-system/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.residentialsolarpanels.org/plan-solar-system</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 Jun 2010 12:31:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Wouter</title>
		<link>http://www.residentialsolarpanels.org/plan-solar-system/comment-page-1#comment-904</link>
		<dc:creator>Wouter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 May 2010 11:32:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.residentialsolarpanels.org/?p=115#comment-904</guid>
		<description>This is amazing information. THank you so much!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is amazing information. THank you so much!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://www.residentialsolarpanels.org/plan-solar-system/comment-page-1#comment-815</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Feb 2010 19:39:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.residentialsolarpanels.org/?p=115#comment-815</guid>
		<description>Ooops sorry forgot to deleted this.

Now it&#039;s ok.

Much Thanks</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ooops sorry forgot to deleted this.</p>
<p>Now it&#8217;s ok.</p>
<p>Much Thanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: C Purvis</title>
		<link>http://www.residentialsolarpanels.org/plan-solar-system/comment-page-1#comment-814</link>
		<dc:creator>C Purvis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Feb 2010 18:30:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.residentialsolarpanels.org/?p=115#comment-814</guid>
		<description>There is a mistake in the calculations.  you use the standard size of a solar panel 2m^2, to get your 47.  So it is incorrect to then divide the 47 by 2 - the standard size of a panel to determine how many panels.  The way you calculated it, you would need 47 standard size panels (that are 2m^2 each)
5  (Solar Radiation) x 2 (Surface Area of standard solar panels) x 0.07 (Solar Panel Efficiency) x 30.42 (Average n° of days per month) = 21.294 kWh produced per panel each month.

To cover at 100% the month Kw usage of 1000Kw divide 1,000/21.294 = 47, so you would need 47 m² of panels to completely eliminate your electricity bill.

This means You’ll need 24 solar panels of 2 m² each (2 m² is the standard size of solar panels)  - no, you are dividing it twice.

But, great info otherwize.... I also don&#039;t see where the previous commenters got 70%, all i see is .07 which is 7%.  Thanks</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is a mistake in the calculations.  you use the standard size of a solar panel 2m^2, to get your 47.  So it is incorrect to then divide the 47 by 2 &#8211; the standard size of a panel to determine how many panels.  The way you calculated it, you would need 47 standard size panels (that are 2m^2 each)<br />
5  (Solar Radiation) x 2 (Surface Area of standard solar panels) x 0.07 (Solar Panel Efficiency) x 30.42 (Average n° of days per month) = 21.294 kWh produced per panel each month.</p>
<p>To cover at 100% the month Kw usage of 1000Kw divide 1,000/21.294 = 47, so you would need 47 m² of panels to completely eliminate your electricity bill.</p>
<p>This means You’ll need 24 solar panels of 2 m² each (2 m² is the standard size of solar panels)  &#8211; no, you are dividing it twice.</p>
<p>But, great info otherwize&#8230;. I also don&#8217;t see where the previous commenters got 70%, all i see is .07 which is 7%.  Thanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greg Emmet</title>
		<link>http://www.residentialsolarpanels.org/plan-solar-system/comment-page-1#comment-795</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg Emmet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Dec 2009 19:25:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.residentialsolarpanels.org/?p=115#comment-795</guid>
		<description>Agreed with tuireo...the only solar panels remotely approaching that efficiency are space-based. Terrestrial solar panels are not that powerful. :D

References:

http://www.solarpanelnexus.com/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Agreed with tuireo&#8230;the only solar panels remotely approaching that efficiency are space-based. Terrestrial solar panels are not that powerful. <img src='http://www.residentialsolarpanels.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':D' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>References:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.solarpanelnexus.com/" rel="nofollow">http://www.solarpanelnexus.com/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tuireo</title>
		<link>http://www.residentialsolarpanels.org/plan-solar-system/comment-page-1#comment-729</link>
		<dc:creator>tuireo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 20:30:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.residentialsolarpanels.org/?p=115#comment-729</guid>
		<description>where did you get your 70%?!?!?! 
the efficiency of solar are not rather 10 to 15% ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>where did you get your 70%?!?!?!<br />
the efficiency of solar are not rather 10 to 15% ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.342 seconds -->
